Sample 1
Production reviews reveal inconsistent handling of uncertainty in final reports. Sometimes conflicting subagent findings are synthesized into a single confident statement (losing nuance), while other times reports over-hedge with excessive qualifications (becoming unhelpful). When the web search agent returns "industry analysts estimate $50B market size (methodology varies)" and the document analysis agent returns "peer-reviewed study estimates 35B(±7B, 95% CI)," the coordinator either picks one arbitrarily or produces vague statements like "the market may be 35B−50B depending on factors." What systematic approach best addresses this?